Hire talent · CMS
Hire Strapi developers who stay after the CMS goes live.
Senior engineers who model your content properly, wire Strapi to your front end and keep it running afterwards. Our own site is built this way: Strapi as a build-time source, with a gate that stops bad content reaching production.
What they do
Hire Strapi developers who stay after the CMS goes live, end to end.
Content modelling in Content-Type Builder
Collection types, single types, components and relations modelled around how your editors actually think, not around your database. Draft and publish, and field limits written into the schema so mistakes are caught at entry.
Front end integration
Wiring Strapi to Astro, Next, Nuxt or a bespoke front end over REST or GraphQL. Pagination, population, image handling and preview, done once in an adapter so changing the content source later is configuration, not a rewrite.
Build-time rendering and the SEO gate
Content pulled during the build and rendered into static HTML, with meta and structured data present in the delivered page. A gate then checks the output and fails the build rather than let a broken page reach production.
Migration onto Strapi
Moving off WordPress, a page builder, a spreadsheet or hand-written HTML. We map the old fields to the new model, migrate the media, keep the URLs and put redirects in place so the search traffic follows you across.
Custom plugins and lifecycle hooks
Custom controllers, routes, services and lifecycle hooks for when the default admin is not enough. Roles and permissions set so each editor sees the fields they need and none of the ones they could break.
Hosting, upgrades and media
Strapi on a container platform with a managed Postgres database, uploads on object storage rather than an ephemeral disk, backups scheduled, and a plan for taking Strapi's own version upgrades without a scramble.
How it runs
Plan. Build. Run.
A 30 minute call
We go through what the CMS has to do, who edits it, what front end it feeds and where it will run. No deck. You come away knowing whether Strapi is the right choice, including if the answer is that it is not.
A scope, a price, a person
You get the work written down with a timeline and a fixed price, and a named engineer with the relevant Strapi experience. You meet them and can say no before anything starts.
Embedded and shipping
They join your repository, your sprint cycle, your chat and your code review process, and work the way your team already works. One person is accountable for the outcome and reports on it.
Handover, then we run it
You get documentation written for editors and documentation written for engineers. From there you either take it in-house or move to our managed retainer, where we monitor it, patch it, fix it and report monthly.
Why infoloop
We do not hand over and leave.
- We run Strapi headless ourselvesOur own site is built that way: Strapi as a build-time content source, static output, and a gate that blocks the deploy when content breaks the rules. It is not an approach we read about and repeated.
- Content in the HTML, not fetched laterWe render content into the delivered page instead of fetching it in the browser. Search engines and answer engines get the copy and the schema in the first response, which is where the ranking is decided.
- The build refuses bad contentEvery rule in our gate exists because that defect was found on a real site. Titles, descriptions, canonicals, heading order, alt text, structured data, dead links. Self-service editing without the usual cost.
- Senior people, employed by usNo bench, no CV pile, no recruitment fee. The engineer is ours, matched to your stack, and accountable for your outcome rather than for filling in an hourly timesheet.
- We stay after it goes liveMost shops hand over and leave. We would rather keep running it: monitoring, security updates, fixes against agreed response targets, improvements, and a monthly report of what actually changed.
What you get
Every engagement includes these, in writing, before work starts.
- A documented content model, with the field limits written into the schema itself.
- A read-only API token, so the build can never write anything back to your Strapi.
- A publish webhook that triggers a build and blocks the deploy when a check fails.
- Postgres and object storage set up, with backups scheduled and restores tested.
- Editor documentation written for the people who publish, not for the engineers.
- Your repository, your Strapi instance, your data. Nothing of it locked to us.
Who this is for
Three situations where this is the right call.
Every copy change goes through an engineer
Your marketing team raises a ticket to change a headline and it waits behind the roadmap. Strapi, modelled properly, moves that work to the people who own the words, without handing them anything they can break.
A Strapi build that has stalled
The model was set up by someone who has since left, the front end fetches everything on every request, and nobody is sure what breaks if they touch it. You need someone senior to read it, say plainly what is wrong, and fix it in place.
Moving off WordPress or a page builder
Plugins keep breaking, the editor and the site are the same fragile thing, and every performance fix is undone by the next update. You want the content separated from the front end, with the URLs and the search traffic preserved.
Questions
What buyers ask us first.
How does hiring a Strapi developer through you work, and what does it cost?
Should Strapi be fetched at build time or at runtime?
Can you work in our existing Strapi project rather than starting again?
Where should Strapi be hosted, and what does it cost to run?
What happens after launch?
How do you stop an editor publishing something that breaks SEO?
Tell us what your editors are blocked on. We'll bring the Strapi engineer.
One 30 minute call to go through your content model, your front end and where Strapi will run. You leave with a written scope, a timeline and a price. You meet the engineer before anything starts.