Home/Insights/Build vs buy vs run

Comparison

Build, buy or run: choosing your path for AI.

A simple framework for technical leaders deciding how to put AI to work, per workflow. Build when it is core IP, buy when the problem is solved, and run when you want fit without the overhead of a team.

4.9 Trustpilot· 4.8 Google· 4.7 Clutch·Certified Webflow & Shopify Partners

Side by side

The three paths, compared.

FactorBuildBuyRun (with infoloop)
Time to liveMonths, sometimes quartersDays to weeksWeeks, shaped to you
Fit to your workflowExactOff the shelf, limitedHigh, configured
Upfront costHighLow to mediumMedium
Who maintains itYou hire and keep a teamThe vendor, on their roadmapWe do, monthly
Risk of it stallingHigh without the right teamLow, but you outgrow itLow, we run it
Best whenIt is core IP and uniqueA common, solved problemYou want fit without the overhead

Our take

Most teams overbuild, then cannot maintain it.

The hard part of AI is not the demo, it is keeping it alive in production. The "run" path gives you the fit of custom without hiring a team to babysit it. When something truly is core IP, we build that too.

FAQ

Common questions.

When should we build custom AI?
When the workflow is core to your business and genuinely unique, and you have or will hire a team to maintain it. Otherwise the cost of keeping it alive outweighs the fit.
When is buying off the shelf enough?
When the problem is common and solved, and a standard tool fits closely. The risk is outgrowing it or bending your process to the software.
What does "run" mean here?
We deploy a proven system or a tailored build, configure it to you, then monitor, fix and improve it every month. You get fit without hiring and keeping a team.

Not sure which path fits? Let us map it.

Book a call and we will work through build, buy or run for each of your workflows, with a clear recommendation.

Book a callChecklist